Bibliography
“It is the custom to ornament every scientific work with a bibliography”
“The aim may be to test the test the reader’s competence by laying out for him an awe- inspiring course of reading; it may be to prove the author’s competence by showing the mountain of dross he has sifted to win one nugget of truth”. (Peter p.79)
Acosta, P. (2010). Promotion dynamics the Peter Principle: incumbents vs. internal hires. Labour Economica. 17, 975-988.
Baleanu, V. (2007). The economic basis in organizational behavior – behavioral theory of the firm. Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics. 7, 29-36.
Buchman, M. (2010). Incompetence rules. New Scientist, 67-69.
Cummings, P. W. (11971). Incompetencies of the Peter Principle. Training and Development Magazine. 9, 33-36.
DickinsonDavid L., Villeval Marie Claire Job Allocation Rules and Sorting Efficiency: Experimental Outcomes in a Peter Principle Environment. Forthcoming in Southern Economic Journal, 2011
Dickinson/Villeval (2007) Discussion Paper 3205
Fairburn, J. A., Malcomson, J. M. (2001). Performance, promotion, and the Peter Principle. The Review of Economic Studies, 68 (241), 43-66.
Floyd. R.E. (1993 May/June) The Four “Ins” of Management-avoid them! Industrial Management 35(3) 1-2
Hess, H. H. (1976). The real Peter Principle: promotion to pain. Harvard Business Review, 10-12, 158-159.
Kane, J. (1970). Dynamics of the Peter Principle. Management Science, 16(12), B800-B811.
Lazear, E. P. (2004). The Peter Principle: a theory in decline. The Journal of Political Economy. 112, S141-S163.
Lazear. Edward P The Peter Principle: Promotions and Declining Productivity Working paper 8094 [Retrieved from] May 2012
http://www.nber.org/papers/w8094 National Bureau of Economic Research C2001
Lazear, Edward P (2000-10-12). "The Peter Principle: Promotions and Declining Productivity" (PDF). Hoover Institution and Graduate School of Business, Stanford University. .
Lewis. B.J. (1999 March/April) Before you promote an employee Journal of Management Engineering 4(2) 13-19
Peter, Laurence J; Hull, Raymond (1969). The Peter Principle: Why Things Always Go Wrong. New York: William Morrow and Company. ISBN 0688275443.
Pluchino, A., Rapisarda, A., Garofalo, C. (2010). The Peter Principle revisited: a computational study. Physica, A389, 467-472.
Sabatier. Mareva: Promotion and Productivity in French Academia: A Test of the Peter Principle [Retrieved]25 May 2012[from]
Schaap James Ike, Ph.D (c 2009) The Peter Principle: Is This Forty-Year-Old Universal Phenomenon in Decline or Growing? [Retrieved]20 May 2012[from]http://www.jgbm.org/page/1%20James%20Ike%20Schaap%20.pdf